CIA // OPPORTUNITY DESK 05

Crypto Intelligence
Ratings

Find cases where evidence-adjusted quality may be stronger than valuation implies. Compare quality, cheapness, dilution and liquidity—then test the thesis, not just the score.

SNAPSHOT 2026-08-26 · CURATED INPUTS · NOT A LIVE PRICE FEED
ASSETS_RATED
36
VALUE_PRICED
34
HIGH_CONFIDENCE
19
MODEL_STATE
BETA_05
OPPORTUNITY_LANDSCAPE // FOUR LENSES

Interactive value map

HOVER / TAP ICON TO INSPECT
READ THIS MAP
01 →Cheaper versus usage, economics and comparable assets
02 ↑Stronger quality after evidence and confidence haircuts
03 ◎TOP-RIGHT = strongest potential-value screen
Cheapness is relative valuation—not a low token price. Bottom-right can be a value trap.
POTENTIAL VALUE
WEAK / NOT CHEAP
QUALITY / EXPENSIVE
VALUE TRAPS
LOW ← VALUATION CHEAPNESS → HIGH
LOW ← EVIDENCE-ADJUSTED QUALITY → HIGH
SIZE = MARKET-STRUCTURE PROXY · RING = CONFIDENCE · POSITION ≠ PRICE TARGET34/36 VISIBLE · 2 UNPRICED
GRADE_DISTRIBUTION

Coverage shape

AAA–AA
2
A–BBB
7
BB–B
18
CCC–CC
8
C
1
VALUE compares valuation cheapness with evidence-adjusted quality. Top-right means potential value—not a buy signal. QUALITY, MARKET and EVIDENCE expose why a cheap token may still be a trap.
METHODOLOGY // BETA 05

How the signal works.

Scores are comparative research signals—not credit ratings, price targets or investment advice. Opportunity ranks research priority; it does not predict returns.

0130%

Fundamentals

Usage quality, fee demand, retention, developer activity, product fit and economic durability.

0225%

Security

Audits, incident history, trust assumptions, decentralization and operational resilience.

0320%

Market structure

Executable liquidity, venue quality, depth, volatility, concentration and reflexivity.

0415%

Distribution

Ownership concentration, unlocks, emissions, insiders and stakeholder alignment.

0510%

Transparency

Verifiable disclosures, governance, open code, documentation and source coverage.

CALCULATION_PIPELINE
COMPOSITE = (F × .30) + (S × .25) + (M × .20) + (D × .15) + (T × .10)
VALUE QUALITY = (F × .45) + (S × .35) + (T × .20)
EVIDENCE QUALITY = VALUE QUALITY × COVERAGE FACTOR × CONFIDENCE FACTOR
OPPORTUNITY = √(EVID. QUALITY × CHEAPNESS) − ((100−D) × .07) − ((100−M) × .05)

CHEAPNESS is a relative 0–100 research score using circulating and diluted valuation, token demand/capture, sector comparables, emissions and unlocks. Missing reliable valuation or executable-liquidity evidence stays UNPRICED.

  1. 01 // COLLECT

    Protocol, onchain, market, valuation, unlock, governance and incident evidence.

  2. 02 // VERIFY

    Separate observable evidence from project claims and unresolved gaps.

  3. 03 // SCORE

    Score quality and relative cheapness against shared comparative rubrics.

  4. 04 // PENALIZE

    Adjust for evidence confidence, dilution and weak executable liquidity.

CONFIDENCE_IS_NOT_SCORE
HIGH

Broad primary evidence, mature history and independently testable market/security data.

MEDIUM

Useful evidence with meaningful gaps, shorter history or concentrated assumptions.

LIMITED

Young, opaque or illiquid; the displayed score carries a wide uncertainty band.

PROVISIONAL means enough evidence to rank a valuation thesis, but not a fully automated live fair-value model. RESEARCHED signals have stronger comparable and market support.